|
Post by William McCormick on May 27, 2012 18:10:13 GMT -5
Since I was about one and a half years old, I have known about Universal Science. Some people called it, "common sense", some people called it "smarts" or "intelligence", some people called it "real science" or "American science". The reason some did not like the term Universal Science anymore, was because the government, in taking over science, basically named Enrico Firmy the last Universal Scientist, and that was not true. In fact Enrico Firmy was not a good or actual Universal Scientist. www.ne.anl.gov/About/legacy/unisci.shtmlThe fact the government highlighted him should have been enough for the average fellow of the day, to realize that Enrico could not have been a good Universal Scientist. Universal Scientists had proven Chadwick's theory on the neutron as being wrong. At that time, you have to understand, the fellows in my circle knew that actual science, actual knowledge was being shelved or better put thrown away. Counterintelligence had been announced by the government. But like so many policies the government announces, few if any achieve their goals. Most thought it was tough talk, just to hide the bomb (the atom) from any angry drunken bum, with a grudge to settle and a garage to build one. Most people had no idea that the government, actually meant teaching children wrong information about the basic building block of our world. That pitch would not have flown. Let me make it clear, there was no cover-up, there was no conspiracy of any kind. It was more of a great sales pitch, that the country fell for. Once you accepted the product of counterintelligence, or the bulk of your neighbors accepted it for you, it was yours. And very frankly you were too stupid to do anything about it once you accepted it. The government after dropping the bomb on Hiroshima, said that they would "hide the atom from the citizens of earth". Those that knew the atom, and were also citizens, just laughed. For them it was already too late and just too funny a notion. What happened over the next couple of years, was not quite as funny, and they did not laugh as much. All the work of isolating, and exactly classifying, substances, and the workings that allow a substance to be, and act like that substance, were tainted. Slowly at first, with some great debate, and even open and utter refusal to go along with the charade. Many new standards that would have been mandatory to follow in the U.S. were, not enforced. It would have started a revolt, if companies had to suddenly follow nonsense designed to hide the atom and of course electricity. Many that were fighting the new false standards, had no idea that everyday that had passed, while the false standards were on the books. Was turning the new standards into reality. Right or wrong. At some point later in time say ten years down the road, some smart-aleck, fellow came along and said to the big manufacturer you have to follow the old standard. The fellow that knew it was not a standard but rather counterintelligence realized, he was played, by yet another trick of counterintelligence. The longer you allow stupid to be your logo the harder it will be to stop being stupid, or being seen as stupid. Many giant companies that refused to go along, were swept aside by the big machine. Science had been turned into a bullying ground, with very mean bullies, surrounded by their cowardly unscientific backers, rather than actual science. To talk of the truth, during these times could end you up in an actual scuffle. Most knew something was up, but the think of the masses was, "don't rock the boat, we are getting paid well". They knew it could bring poverty, no contracts, and ridicule to stand up to government. Much like our Benjamin Franklin received, for his amazing papers on lightning and static electricity. The government the very poor government, suddenly had billions to spend on grants, and other tools, to steer education towards their desired goals. Which unfortunately were counterintelligence. Colleges that did not sell, the governments new curriculum were not given grants or tax breaks. Those stubborn colleges found their sphere of supporters, also not supplied by the gravy train. You have to understand that at this time many true Americans knew that poverty was just a sign, of a very corrupt government. Seething perverts, unable, with any amount of money, or power, to satisfy their greed, lust, and evil thirst of power. The seed of greed had already taken hold, and corrupted too many people, to allow a few sane words and observations to change things. Guns were being used by the government to obtain their objectives. Both here and abroad. When sane words precisely attacked home front issues, the government was quick to blame, other countries massing of weapons, or knowledge. Often the very countries, the government was claiming to be keeping knowledge from, had this knowledge already. In some cases they had the taboo knowledge for decades, or centuries. But since the other country would often deny this, there was nothing to say really. In other countries it was standard procedure to keep the people stupid, so that they could be used like slaves or worse as peasants, with no way for them to stand up to government. That was recognized here in America and we almost went to war, once again, with our government. The government threw race and whatever else they could think of at the issue of counterintelligence. Counterintelligence had just won some sort of victory for lack of an actual term. By claiming that people that had just been educated by college were getting higher pay, doing less work, than those doing the same thing without a degree. The truth was that the government made it a law that they had to get paid more. They also offered tremendous tax breaks to companies that hired college people. The truth was that manufacturing, did not want the college person. He was often arrogant and would try to tell the businessman how to run his own establishment. Often offering ideas that were old and totally ridiculous. These college people were often put to lesser tasks, or basically kept out of the way of the actual production. Just so the company could get the perks. Or keep their nephew on. The government, acting as if white people were blocking black people from college, claimed that now blacks would get this great knowledge, too. It was the ultimate in counterintelligence. Today I would admit that it will be tough to prove this point. But if you have an open mind, consider that the government is that corrupt and frightened of the actual knowledge of the atom. Anything you could learn in a college could be learned on the job apprenticing in a much shorter time period. This is just the first of many posts I hope to make. To offer you a glimpse into my very different world. Sincerely, William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on May 28, 2012 23:29:50 GMT -5
You might be wondering, who are or were Universal Scientists. Benjamin Franklin was probably the first, or he was at least the fellow who brought Universal Science to light. You might also be wondering what is the big deal about Universal Science, what is so special about the core information of Universal Science? To be honest Universal Science was something of a pyramid to the average person, from a distance people just saw a great structure of knowledge go up almost over night. It was amazing. But up close it was just the pain staking day in, day out, exacting observations of, experiments and actual products in action. It was actually very exciting for those that made big advancements, by basically assembling all their pieces of the Universal puzzle more quickly then the average fellow. As you get more and more pieces of a puzzle, as you probably know the pieces usually start to come together faster and faster. The same was true with the real universe. It was no joke, or no story, that in America most things, like transistors, TV's, Radios, Telegraphs, even computers, were built by men that had less then eighth grade educations. Some less then that. If you made it to the eighth grade you were some kind of genius. What they used to study in the eighth grade would rival what most come away with in college today. But times demanded that men take heed of the pending doom, and they did. It was just unfortunate that fear, greed and stupidity, managed to out muscle American goals. Universal Science was a very pure, a very holy if you will, institution, where money was no object. Part of the reason that money was no object to Universal Scientists, was that Benjamin Franklin had proven, that money was no object, and that poverty was the work of evil, not of men, of good character. Perhaps that is a lot to swallow, so I will relay a lesson I learned from my forth grade school teacher that was still teaching pre-World War Two economics. My teacher told the class to bring in eight personal items from home, that interested us. It could be model cars, planes, boats, Barbie Dolls for the girls, trinkets from vacations, anything interesting. When we did bring them in she told us that she was the government, and that she had printed paper money, that she was going to give to us. She said that we owed her for that money. She also gave each of us a roll of pennies that we were going to need to pay a penny tax on each dollar we spent. We were going to use the paper with a number one written on the paper, to trade our possessions back and forth with. Each time we traded one of our possessions to someone else, we would receive a dollar, and the teacher, or the government would receive one penny. The tax basically on the trade. She said that we could make believe that we were farmers or blacksmiths making products and selling them. Like it happens in real life. So we got to it, and in about 20 minutes, we started breaking paper dollars, because our pennies were gone. She stopped us when we were about broke, and reminded us that we still owed her for the money she had given us. A lot of kids realized that the government could do all kinds of good things with money they print, because it will all rather quickly end up right back in the governments pocket, even at a penny on the dollar. Some children asked why then, is there so much poverty especially in the ghettos, and the teacher rather point blank said that there were very dishonest people in charge. She then said that she was going to give back the money she printed to us for another experiment, and raise the tax from one penny on the dollar, to fifty cents on the dollar. In just four minutes we had no money. The system was dry. So if the government did not immediately replace the money being taken out by taxes, poverty was instantly created. The system stops. The monetary system is just like the human bloodstream. If you remove blood, you had better have a way to replace it. Or the system the human body is doomed. In a growing society, new limbs, new manufacturing sectors, go on line, and need a new supply of money from the government, the government that is taxing the system. That is what happened when they started the space program. They injected printed money into the monetary system, a very large amount for that time to fuel the space program. Orders went out for the finest metals and tooling equipment on earth. That puts huge demands on ore mines, mills, tool and die houses, and of course an increase in all the common support products a business uses. The government people, in charge, that no longer understood how money works went into a panic, as a huge money shortage was created. Poverty was running rampant. And no one could get to the top to tell them to relax, and that it was to be expected. It was later found that they had collected a sum of money in taxes that was more then twice as large as the money they injected. They had already cancelled the space program, and blamed poverty on the space program. The rest is history. They opted for the space shuttle that was actually not a space vehicle but rather a high orbit vessel. With all that said, the real problem today is that our science is no longer science. It is a witch doctor form of science. Where the masses study what has been done for a half century or more. It is often no longer basically understood. They know that you take this stuff over here, that may be mislabeled, and mix it with this stuff over there, that my also be mislabeled, while never knowing what they are actually working with. This is so true that for most of my life, I have been telling people not to breath in cement dust. Because it contains carbon, raw carbon, like photo copy carbon, in the lungs causes carbonic acid to form, and it scars the lungs. Up until a few years ago, I was arguing with cement manufacturers, that there was carbon in cement. And they flatly denied it, the conversations could often become heated. Just recently some manufacturers admitted that there is carbon in cement. People that work near running automobiles also run the risk of lung damage from the carbon. Years ago this was more well known, but as decades pass I find even myself almost unaware of the danger. Space heaters and other devices dump carbon directly into the air. As far as electricity goes, Benjamin Franklin is still the king of electric. Everyone else is a professed fly by night plumber, when it comes to electricity. Benjamin Franklin over 250 years ago, precisely identified the particle of electricity as being much smaller then the particles of matter. It was an amazing find for that time. Benjamin Franklin had also discovered how to actually tell the direction of electricity. Something that baffled college folk. Today our batteries are mislabeled thanks to colleges. Twenty years ago colleges boasted that they were right to change from Benjamin Franklin's exacting labeling of electricity. Today there is a rather somber silence about the most embarrassing thing that could happen to America. America started when Benjamin Franklin realized that static electricity was just a small amount of lightning. There was no difference at all. That is how he was able to fly a kite in an electric storm easily. By using silk to isolate the kite string from his body. Benjamin Franklin had found that with static electricity he could end slavery, with the unlimited power he could obtain from static electricity. Benjamin Franklin built an electric turkey spit that would run for twenty minutes, by just stroking a glass sphere with his hand a few times to power it. Benjamin Franklin also realized a bit later that slavery was a tool of big government. If big government gives you slaves, and you use them, you are less likely to be offended by someone of a 'higher order" telling you what to do. Benjamin Franklin correctly observed slavery as a poison pill for America. Benjamin Franklin's greatest discovery in my mind was his use of points and flats to correctly tell the direction of electricity. To find the terminal with the abundance, of particles of electricity. The terminal with the positive electromotive force or pressure. Modern colleges found a way to destroy all his work, by mislabeling our batteries. And then to hide their act, they invented the neutron, and then claimed the particle of electricity was some how negatively charged. Perhaps the most comical and unscientific thing you could say about the particle of electricity. The particle of electricity repels all things, where ever it is in abundance there will be pressure, positive pressure just like in a garden hose under pressure. The most confusing thing about electricity is that there is a phenomena called ARC (Anode, Rectified, Cathode), lightning is an ARC. As you watch lightning in the sky you can often see it meander around, not take a straight path from point A to point B. Lightnings path is often jagged. That is because lightning is not a flow of electricity from point A to point B. It is a reaction, an opposite reaction to electricity traveling from point A to point B. Electricity from the earth moves up to the cloud, then an ARC is formed, it is just an area to high in voltage to exist in the universe, in that confined space. So that area spreads out, to lesson the voltage at the source. Lightning drains the ARC voltage from the cloud to any place of less voltage. In this movie below you are going to see a silent beam of electricity precisely beamed to a stainless steel plate. There is no ARC present. There is no meandering or crooked path. The electrode, beaming the particles is charged (-) as on a modern car battery. You might be able to see how Benjamin Franklin used points and flats to demonstrate electricity correctly. In the last or third part of the movie you are watching a (+) charged electrode as marked on a modern car battery, being hit with a beam from the stainless plate, forming a noisy ARC, that beams back to the stainless plate. youtu.be/dYReqtnmM4Q Sincerely, William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Jun 1, 2012 20:10:04 GMT -5
The thing that made the Universal Scientist different or stand out from other, single field scientists, was that he was hands on across the board in almost every field.
He went to see the aftermaths, of industrial accidents to help bring understanding to what actually took place, and why. He could grab a shovel and dig for clues. He was in it for the life.
The Universal scientist built his base of knowledge with exacting experiments and the information of actual products built.
There was nothing like a Universal Scientist, and that is why they were so amazing. They finished their basic courses of the Universe. They got to a point in their own mind where they were 99.9 percent sure of what they were talking about. And they were.
Unfortunately as governments create poverty to oppress knowledge, the younger men coming up in the field of science, got lazy and bored, with the wait, to do experiments on their own. Poverty limits the amount of experimenting that can be done. It leads to failed products, and a more controllable citizen or peasant, when all is said and done.
Many opted for the new quick sliver, college program and group experiments offered by colleges for those that could afford it. Unfortunately, a good college would have sent these men off to the real world to start their education. The colleges that were promising Universal Scientists upon completion were just after the money.
What was created was the Chadwick's of the world. Men totting degrees issued by institutions, that had been a gathering place for real Universal Scientists, to share their experiments. So some of the newer perhaps less interested in science, young men started to attend these colleges, they wanted more, they wanted it faster. Kind of like wanting to write a book but not taking the time to learn how to type.
They wanted to be world renowned scientists. That is something the Universal Scientist never wants. Because he is too busy understanding the real world, and does not want to just dance, for a room full of fools that want to say they were lectured by a Universal Scientist. There should be plenty of accomplished scientists in your community able to discuss almost any subject to a positive goal.
You have to understand that even when a dollar purchased many gallons of gas. A universal scientist would receive about $1700 an hour, to lecture. And they actually deserved that, and more. Because in that hour lecture, a person could actually walk away with a total understanding of how the universe actually works.
Many Universal Scientists donated their funds, educating others, or to do experiments that would benefit others. Their life was complete with the understanding of the universe. They really needed nothing more.
Most felt compelled to share that amazing feeling of being 99.9 percent sure of what was happening around them. Their work was done, actually. They had become whole individuals very much in touch with the entire universe. Most Universal Scientists felt after understanding the universe, that there was certainly a higher power. Most of the newer scientists believed they new it all, and that they were the higher power.
Universal Scientists came under attack, because Universal Scientists were from the school of our founding fathers. Our beloved first President of the United States, once said,
"Nothing better deserves your patronage more then the promotion of science and literature. Knowledge is in every country the surest basis of public happiness". George Washington.
So as the government that decided they were smarter then our founding fathers steered the country away from truth, honesty, the American way, the Universal Scientist stood in their way.
The Universal Scientist did not get steam rolled, he did not go quietly into the night. Rather he continued with the most powerful tool / weapon against ignorance, communication. He was communicating truth, and knowledge as our country demands each of us to do.
As much as I can tell you, of massive programs aimed at making Americans ignorant, putting soldiers in fields to die, while technology exists to make that ridiculous. For all the hatred from government servants who have lost touch with truth, and our founding fathers. There is this most powerful, apparently unstoppable force, that pales the counterintelligence effort against us. It is communication for the purpose of assembling and gathering to form a more perfect union, by promoting knowledge over ignorance.
The power of communicating knowledge, is so great and so unstoppable, that you may feel that you can sit back relax, and just watch, the good guys, blow the door off the hinges, of the evil lair, while you cheer.
I wish that was true. I would do it tomorrow for you, if I thought that was the right thing to do. But to be honest we need communication about the problem at hand. Not just a few guys showing off the power of Universal Science.
It would be much safer if our neighbors also had this knowledge as well. And took a stronger hand in their own governments. Universal Science certainly gives the citizen an equalizing force against armies.
However smart individuals know that war, even revolution is a frustration, not a well thought out plan.
Benjamin Franklin and George Washington were working on plans to absorb English forces, as they arrived. When colonists out of frustration, with a lack of a plan, started the Boston Tea Party. It forced both of our founding fathers to throw away their amazing plans, and fight a trench war. So before we start a Tea Party I suggest we voice some intelligent truths about real issues that can be easily righted.
I think you will be very interested to learn how light and other forms of energy actually work. I plan to keep posting interesting information about it.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Jun 3, 2012 21:12:18 GMT -5
After 1973 Universal Scientists were no longer allowed to teach the Universe in public schools. The atom was what the new Federal Funding standards claimed it was. So after 1973 you got neutrons and attraction forces as the explanation of the atom, and how the atom works or exists. If you went to an "American" school. This would be a paramount moment in comedy, or hilarious trickery, if it was not counterintelligence being enforced by our servants against the people they were supposed to serve. The Federal government called upon scientists that were separated into two groups, the Universal Scientists, and the new "modern" scientists. The government wanted to know, which group was right. That kind of tells you they were not fit to judge which group was right or which group was wrong. The debates began and the Universal Scientists with no preparation no mountains of worthless paper, appeared before a committee. The Universal scientists went first I believe. They explained the Universe, as it was. They did it in about 45 minutes. They gave a full and total understanding of the universe, to the committee. If there was a problem with their lecture, it was that it proved there was nothing stopping us from living a life 50 times better then we were. It made World War Two look like some kind of police action that wasted hundreds of thousands of our young boys lives, for politics and a world wide slave trade market through the economy, or e-slavery system as I like to call it. So perhaps for the weak hearted it was better to believe these tired rugged looking scientists had just breathed in to much of the gases coming out of their test tubes. Next the "modern" scientists had their say. They talked of using very dangerous substances to achieve goals the Universal Scientist had already achieved. They were promoting unworkable theories, guaranteed to cause confusion through, mislabeling of the actuality. They explained their huge leap from the basics that had built just about everything they had back then, and everything we have today. With the "attraction force" of the universe. When they were asked to demonstrate this attraction force, it ended with two "modern" scientists, both making hugging gestures around each others backs. This would have been a hoot, if the committee did not buy into it. These "modern" scientists or better termed science fiction writers had actually enforced the Universal scientists theory that a pushing force was required no matter what to create the illusion of attraction. Government committee panels are not known for their dazzling brilliance when it comes to real life. Probably because they would not have taken the job of committee member, if they were proficient in real life. In fact if they and others, were proficient in real life no committee board would be needed to control scientists. The truth is there is no attraction force in our universe. If you wish to move something in this universe, you had better be prepared to push it. No matter the scenario, no matter how much it looks like your vacuum, sucked or pulled dirt into the bag or canister. No matter how much it looked like the refrigerator magnet was pulled or attracted to the refrigerator, there was only a force of pressure, or pushing doing the work. Because there is no attraction force in our universe. There are areas created by objects and effects of particles that cause an area of less repulsion allowing the ambient pressure to force objects into the area of less repulsion. You can discuss a rope and how surely a rope is held together by attraction forces, but yet again you will find that the rope is a structure only held together by pressure, or pushing forces. The rope breaks but does not break forces of attraction, rather it breaks pushing forces, that held its structure together. The Universal Scientist already knew that, all atoms, in our universe are held together by pressure. Pressure from an almost invisible ambient radiation. A radiation that bombards our universe from all points around the universe. Universal Scientists at this time already knew that you cannot see an object without something, like a particle leaving the surface of the object being viewed, to bring you the information about the object. So of course you can never see a subatomic particle, because you would need another particle to bring you the information about the one you are viewing. Certainly your eye did not create a vacuum for light. Rather the pressure of light, moved the information to your eye, by the way of pressure. The "modern" theory of light, says that light is created by speeding up, particles around the element of a light bulb, or other source of light. The Universal Scientist knows that, light is a slowing, of the velocity of particles, that are already present, but moving to fast, to be noticed by human perception. This was easily proven. Gentlemen will probably know a little more about this analogy of high velocity projectiles from air or powder actuated guns, compared to sub, atomic matter particles of varying velocity, then the women. Guns offer an understanding of how varying velocity projectiles can cause amazing phenomena. If you take a very low powered, low velocity small caliber round, and fire it into an aluminum can, balanced on a shelf, you will find it flies off the shelf, rather violently, putting two holes, one in and one out of the can. If you then increase the velocity of the exact same projectile, two or three times, you find that you also create two holes, one into the can, and one out of the can, however you will also find that your can did not fly off the shelf. That seems rather odd. I mean you add power, to create velocity, the higher velocity round has much more, potential power then the lower velocity round. Yet the can hit with the higher velocity round is unmoved. Regardless of what school of science you adhere to. You have to look at velocity as a game changer, when it comes to the effects on objects by particles or smaller objects, of different velocities. If you really study this, to an exact understanding of it, you will find that you are probably a Universal Scientist. There are so many factors and variables in an experiment, as the one I proposed. That by the time you totally understand it, you will have an amazing understanding of the universe. Most and I mean most on earth, have no idea of how the universe works. That was the plan, to keep us safe from idiots, so they would not have power, over our day to day life. I think there is a paradox there if you have the stomach for it. You might be wondering how this relates to particles of light. The Universal Scientist found that light was nothing more then particles of electricity moving at a certain velocity. This was so true, at one time, that books on the human eye referred to the human eye as an electrical sensor. Until the whole confusion, about a confusing word like photon, made it into American science. While discussing events that contained light. It was difficult for multinational scientist to grasp "light particles", so they called them photons. Photon originally meant that particles of electricity were traveling at a velocity to impart light upon a surface, in the event in question or review. Let me back step here. Benjamin Franklin was given the Copley award by England, for his work with the lightning rod, which by the way, did away with the work of the French scientist Du Fay. Until Benjamin Franklin proposed the single particle, single fluid theory of electricity. Du Fay was the accepted standard in electricity. Du Fay had the notion that there were two types of electricity, a positive particle and a negative particle. That theory unfortunately for Du Fay is as easy to disprove, as the theory that a soda straw or juice straw, filled with fluid, and blown into, will produce positive soda or juice. And if you suck on the straw, you will get negative soda or juice. Surly no one could be that fooled, even back then? Unfortunately you would wrong, because "modern" "American" colleges fell for it again. It was kind of funny back in Benjamin Franklin's day, the Royal English Science Academy, actually backed up old Du Fay at first. They laughed at Benjamin Franklin's papers on the sameness of static electricity and lightning for about thirty minutes. They heckled his work. Later they awarded Benjamin Franklin with their highest award. Benjamin Franklin used to kill the Turkey for his barbecue before he put it on his electric spit by electrifying the river with static electricity, and electrocuting the turkey. He once commented that the king might benefit from such a treatment. Part of the reason was that while young men in England, Benjamin Franklin's countrymen at that time, were being sent to Church bell towers, to ward off lightning. By ringing the church bell. At this same time Benjamin Franklin, had working lightning rods installed all up and down the Eastern seaboard, keeping homes safe. Most with his own money. If only we could learn from history, we might have avoided this same tragedy once again. I am telling you about all this history, because I am trying to put myself in your place, without a million or more proofs, that were given to me, by some of the greatest men of our time. Many were men that worked on the space program, and still classified weapons projects. As well as truly great scientists, both Universal Scientists, and younger scientists that had seen flaws in the new system. I cannot imagine how this is hitting you, or effecting you. I cannot tell, if you are willing to look at it with an open mind, or laugh for thirty minutes at a fool, with a keyboard and an Internet provider. I am offering a glimpse into the past the present and future exactly how it was, how it is, and what it will be, at our present course and speed, based on the information I was truly blessed to be able to gather at such a young age. I can see how my version of history based on "modern" science might seem hard to believe. And I can see how my version of science based on "modern" history, might be hard to believe. So I have to switch up a bit back and forth, between actual science, and actual history. To sort of fill the gaps I might be creating, discussing either science or history. This post, was about light and how light actually works. So I will get to it. You have probably never seen this, certainly feasible theory, of light. You have probably never discussed this theory before in any classroom. In my school in my day it was how it was. There was no scientific information to refute its accuracy, ever presented. That is because no real information existed that could refute it. It has been refuted, but with grants aimed at hiding the atom. In my next post I will discuss how "modern" scientists theories of light are not feasible. You can use the full screen function by clicking on the icon, located at the far bottom right, of the Youtube screen control panel. To enlarge the picture size. www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0fnkRn_CoA&hd=1 Sincerely, William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Jul 10, 2012 23:16:30 GMT -5
The "modern scientist" of today, is actually the very well paid witch doctor. I have seen the "modern scientist" flip flop back and forth on many subjects. The truth is that he is frightened, of being wrong. He is frightened of being exposed. He is afraid of his own colleagues. It is kind of funny but when a "modern scientist" comes across a truth of the actual universe. He will suddenly realize how criminal the other "modern scientists" are. But up until that time they were all his buddies. If you push him hard enough, on other points, that are just as wrong, he will back up his old buddies that betrayed him. It is a fascinating phenomena of the mind, and a method of self preservation, that some have apparently been taught, or learned in life. Very much like an instinctive, act of an animal. I have watched scientists just flip flop, in the face of confronting their error. They would be too ludicrous to have existed if they have been wrong, and yet taught, enforced, and built things with their wrong theories. So their mind just flip flops, when confronted with powerful truths that rock their world. Do not get me wrong there are really cool scientists out there, unfortunately even some of the cool ones, try to fit in with the modern scientists. They don't want to sit too close to my friends, and get chastised, by their old group of "modern scientists". So even some of the cooler "modern scientists" try to give time travel a little room, they try to give the neutron a little room, they try to give attraction forces a little room. You cannot do that in the field of science. Unless you are humoring the fellow so that he sees his error. The truth is that when I highlight some amazing things we used to do, things we used to have. It is often denied, by all at first. I prove it, and then a few years later it comes out, a littler watered down, they call it a neutron or gamma device, instead of a particle of electricity device. They forget all about where it came from. So I am sure they are not going to get too much good out of it, because they are hurting and denying their own field, and fellow scientists, and the individuals that actually created it. They are being untrue to history and science in the same breath, all for money. So they certainly do not understand money and how money is created. I am sure that some good individuals will benefit from knowledge brought out by whatever means, but far less then would have benefited if it was brought out with pride and the proper history. This is why we are stuck in reverse when it comes to making quality products. By not giving the history of an already invented and tested device, you run the risk of making the same mistakes again. This would by funny if no one was killed or hurt by a known danger of the reinvented device or science in question. www.cradleofaviation.org/history/permanent_exhibits/exploring_space/grumman_xssm-n-6_rigel.htmlThis is a copy of an older webpage, I keep on my server. www.rockwelder.com/military/Rigel.htmLook at Ramjet Rockets, a man died at the factory where they were working on these devices a very long time ago. They were testing an engine that burned only air by mistake. I believe it was on a moist day, and when the moist air entered the engine it burned, powered the engine and then detonated the engine, when it over heated, killing a man. Most never knew these engines existed. So many tried on their own with a combination of fuel and air ramjets, in garages and small industrial parks. Believing they were pioneers of a brand new technology. I am sure some were hurt. Were some of these guys and gals hurt when they found some of their designs would not shut down, even when fuel was cut to them? I cannot say. But we knew it was a possibility. The modern scientist often says nay. Because it breaks laws of "physics". Some people have said wow I did not know we had that Ram Jet technology back then. The truth was that Ramjet Technology, was not really good technology, even back then. But that is all the government wanted for our boys. Often the best or much better technology costs much less then the poor technology. The government does not care, the "law makers" only want to arm our boys with stuff that is less then 100 percent proficient at destroying a target in one shot, or done by one man. So for me, real living, real projects, real technology, is under three layers of war, and many generations of ignorance being passed along to the next generation. When Sputnik was orbiting our planet, Roy Grumman could put a probe on the moon in four hours. And bring it back in another four hours. It was his hobby rock collector. It was just not something that the government wanted out in public, for all to know. It also meant that a ballistic projectile could be launched from just about anywere on earth and make it to the capitlal in a very short period of time. A very short period of time. They called the reason for secrecy the "cold war". While the cold war was going on, scientists, from around the world talked to each other, day in and day out, about all the science there is on earth, nothing was hidden. So each country had the capability to end the world if they wished to do so, with stuff you could buy from local supply houses. As did Hitler's scientists before them, if Hitler was not so afraid of his own people killing him, he might have taught the secret of super weapons to his own people, and then used super weapons. Take a look at these two links. All of this looks like history running on auto pilot to me. www.rockwelder.com/History/GE/gehisp18.jpg#Topwww.rockwelder.com/History/GE/gehisp19.jpg#TopHere is the whole link, that contains both of these pages. www.rockwelder.com/History/GE/HistofGE.htmHere is another fascinating link about General Electric. www.rockwelder.com/History/WorldsFair/WF.htmI was going to discuss why light could not be bouncing off objects. So I will get to at least explaining what it is doing first. Today the "modern scientist" claims that light is both the effect of frequency, or wave length, and also the causse of frequency or wave length. Very frankly if you are just skimming through books on light, or physics maybe that will just make you sleepy, or satisfy a shallow search for how light works. The laws of start stop and change, kind of make bouncing light a comedy. The truth is that the velocity of sub matter particles, causes the spiral path of all sub matter particles to be altered. Very high velocity particles have a very large diameter, straighter, spiral path. Lower velocity particles have a smaller diameter less straight, spiral path. The substance, the sub matter particles travel through, also determines the particles path. The same light source may take on different paths and velocities through different substances. Much like our carbon dioxide laser like sun, that is actually a white ball when viewed from space, looks yellow through a clear blue sky at noon. And can appear orange or even red as it sets on a warm summer day in clear blue skys. Sub matter particles cannot travel through a perfect vacuum. That is why there is no such thing on eath as a perfect vacuum. Because sub matter particles cannot travel through nothing. They would be stopped before leaving a theorhetical perfect vaccum. Because sub matter particles are repelled by all things. Sub matter particles need matter as a medium to travel through. This movie demonstrates why the blue light is of a higher velocity, and red light a slower velocity. Blue light takes a larger diameter more straight, helical path, while red light takes a less straight, smaller diameter helical path. Sincerely, William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Jul 24, 2012 22:12:32 GMT -5
Of course the actual path of light, is not such a twisted path as the experiment in that last movie, exaggerated it to be. For the purpose of understanding the effect, I exaggerated the twisting, of the actual path, light would take, I hope it offered you, at least a possible understanding of another explanation, that may exist in our universe.
This is how light was originally taught in America. It means that the particles of light, actually continue on, once striking the surface of a solid object, in a rather straight path, right through solid objects.
All the other effects, that "modern" scientists call light bouncing off objects, and refraction. Can be explained by the radiation coming out of solid objects, into the excited air, water, or translucent substance. That is lit up, at the surface of the object, the radiation, from within the solid opaque object, is leaving. This radiation slows due to a bottle neck of slow moving particles making the transition between materials.
If you know about AM radio you also know that frequency of the carrier wave, means that in a second the transmitter turns on and off a set number of times in that second, creating the carrier wave.
That carrier wave in itself transmits no information. The information is contained and transmitted at a set voltage, or an agreed upon voltage, within the carrier wave. The agreed upon voltage is the voltage that the gate will connect the receivers antenna output to the receivers amplifier. At a predefined voltage within the carrier wave, it will amplify the weak voltage differential in the signal, that contains the actual information, such as voice or music information.
You might wonder how light could do such a thing, when "modern" scientist swore there is no velocity difference in different color light. That velocity does not communicate color. The truth is that light could not communicate color, if it was not a velocity or voltage like communication.
The frequency created by light, bombarding something, is caused by the velocity of particles of light. A higher velocity particle of light effects more atoms of matter, in any given time period, then a lower velocity particle of light does. Causing a higher frequency in the matter the light is striking.
An objects frequency that is creating light, is positively or negatively accelerating particles of light, to create different colors.
Years ago X-rays were described in voltage, the higher the voltage the higher the velocity the more penetration. Things were simpler back then.
In order for voice or music radio to bounce and carry with it any clarity, it has to create an ARC (Anode, Rectified, Cathode) effect on the surface it bounces off of. As most radio operators know to get a perfect bounce off ordinary things it is very hard to do. It only happens under certain circumstances. And only at certain angles. Certainly nothing like the amazing detail light brings to us over millions of miles, from any angle.
Even radio does not actually bounce. We just call it bounce, but it actually works on the same principle of light. Where the bounce like effect is just the ambient radiation being slowed to radio velocity as it leaves the surface being struck.
I was really interested in highlighting that it is the tiny voltage differential in the radio signal that is lost when you try to "bounce" the signal.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Jan 28, 2013 22:05:02 GMT -5
You might remember I was talking about the spiral path of light. This spiral path of light manifests itself all throughout our lives.
The oceans even in sunlight only allow blue emissions as you go deeper and deeper. That is because the straighter path of the blue light allows blue to travel deeper, then green or red light.
The human eye works the same way, the blue light is received only at the base of the receptors in the retina. The other less straight traveling colors of light, slam into the sides of the receptors, before they can reach the area reserved for blue light. That is how the human eye perceives light.
Faster particles like x-rays are traveling in a very straight path, and therefore can penetrate many inches of steel.
This is how it was taught many moons ago.
I hope everyone is enjoying good health, finding happiness, and worshiping God in their own way.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Mar 23, 2013 7:45:34 GMT -5
When talking to people about money, and taxation, and how taxation is not necessary in a healthy society. I have noticed that there is a great confusion, and even frustration involved with understanding the actual system.
My thought is if it is frustrating do not feel bad, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, and his men, while figuring out how to run a country, in case, or when England invaded the shores of America. Had to demonstrate and understand every system they were going to implement in the new country they would form.
Considering George Washington had spent much time and lost many fellow soldiers during the French and Indian war, because they were not supplied properly. It is a sure thing, he was rather surprised to find out how money is tied to gold.
Benjamin Franklin was a printer, and George Washington had money, gold.
They set out to demonstrate their system, Benjamin Franklin the new government, printed and paid George Washington 100 dollars for a hunk of his gold. When George Washington went to spend that 100 dollars, for supplies for his farm, Benjamin Franklin or the government, took fifty dollars of the money back, that was the tax at the time.
Now Benjamin Franklin or the government had one hundred dollars worth of gold, and fifty dollars of their freshly printed paper money back. When the farm supply owner spent that fifty dollars, Benjamin Franklin and the government had one hundred dollars worth of gold, and seventy five dollars of their paper back. All for merely printing it.
I can only imagine the outrage, that George Washington must have felt, knowing the French and Indian war was just a political exercise by all countries involved. To keep the colonist poor and desperate.
When this new knowledge of money was declared on street posts and in taverns and shops. The colonists threatened to string up the British governors. England canceled all taxes in America. And for the first time, a family could buy a new plow and eat. A family could buy medicine, and food to eat. A blacksmith could buy new tools and buy a new forge and afford cloths. Almost over night half of America realized what a charade the old government was. It took amazing courage to face their own ignorance. And the aristocrats that thought there were different classes of people. Themselves and those that should be kept ignorant, and work like slaves.
Some got to caught up in the aristocrats simple brain. And made enemies with them, rather then to let them fade out with time. The three pence on the pound tax on tea, the only tax in America, was created by the aristocrats, and stated they did it because they wanted to. No special reason they just wanted to.
Of course the Tea Party was the violent response. It was not strategically thought out, it was done in anger. It ended up bringing English solders to American shores prematurely. George Washington knew they were coming either way, the Tea Party just expedited their arrival. Forcing George Washington and Benjamin Franklin into a hasty ground war. They had been planning to absorb British troops arriving on Americas shores, giving them a place to live and setting them up in the community.
That is why I do not condone a "Tea Party" it is better to openly discuss real issues.
George Washington felt so strongly about this that he said that we should take up arms against our nation, if the Federal government ever levied more then a one penny Federal tax upon us. Even and especially in times of war. Because George Washington had lived through the high taxes during war times, that made farmers so poor they could not afford seed and supplies. So all went hungry.
He stated anything more then a penny contribution on the dollar is something other then good government.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Mar 24, 2013 14:51:11 GMT -5
This is a link I was thinking about while writing a previous post. It highlights that we have been untrue to our own, basic mores, tenants, history and doctrine. America is failing, and becoming the victim of attacks, that we know we should be prepared for. George Washington had this to say about war. "The most effectual means of preserving the peace is to be prepared for war". Here you can see that what we called at this time a sneak attack by a hideous secret German weapon, was just the usual and very obvious old submarine weapon. The United States submarine the Turtle was used unsuccessfully, against the British during our revolutionary war. However the fear it struck in the hearts of British soldiers and navel men, was its most useful effect. No longer could British ships sit comfortably in safe harbors. They were forced to sail in rough weather out at sea in the ocean. Many a ship was lost because of this fear of anchoring in the harbor. Many a supply ship was too late in bringing needed British supplies to its troops, because they were so far off the shore. Communication problems with shore and ships, became an issue as well. No longer could you make out the faces of men on shore. Soldiers dressed as British soldiers could lure in supply boats and take needed supplies. It is the failure to learn from history, and properly record history that has nearly doomed the United States and of course the real science, that Benjamin Franklin fought so hard to bring to us. The most effectual means of not involving ourselves in a bloody revolution is to be prepared for a bloody revolution. Sincerely, William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Mar 24, 2013 15:57:13 GMT -5
Benjamin Franklin to most today is some old Grandfather like fellow that is not at all a person that they could really look up to. The truth is that Benjamin Franklin was a wild man of invention, ingenuity, history and modern living. His visions of what electricity could do for us, pale what it has done for us already. Many today because of the mislabeling of electricity and electrical equipment, do not understand just how amazing Benjamin Franklin was even for our time. The false rumors of Benjamin Franklin's error in the labeling of electricity. The introduction of many phony atomic particles introduced as being real by colleges. Accusations that Benjamin Franklin was a womanizer were all designed by hideously inaccurate colleges, trying to stave off attack for teaching nonsense. What you might think you would have learned, about one of the greatest men our planet has seen in all of history. Would be that he in fact was correct. That he in fact did eventually receive full recognition for his work on the sameness of static electricity and lightning. If you were going to an American school, teaching truth honesty and the American way. He refuted the two particle theory of electricity, that the French scientist Du Fay had introduced. And colleges picked up once again. As some of you have probably realized truth is not a friend to evil. And evil is what we have today in control of our country. Check out this PDF below. It offers a more upstanding view of a great American. www.rockwelder.com/history/BenjaminFranklin/BenjaminFranklin.pdfThere is a very powerful reason we no longer hold Benjamin Franklin as a person, that truly exemplifies America. It is because he was painfully honest. He was always a fraction of a second away from a real solution to any problem. All we have left of Benjamin Franklin today are a few historical documents. The rest that you hear about him, in schools and colleges is tainted information, lies, designed to belittle him. Very sad indeed. Sincerely, William McCormick
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Aug 13, 2013 18:02:59 GMT -5
You may be finding some of the information I presented to you interesting, or perhaps just too funny to believe. Well it gets better, or worse, depending upon what school of thought you adhere to.
I had mentioned in an earlier post that frequency of matter being struck by, or emitting a certain color light is created, by the particles of electricity, that are creating the light striking the matter. That is sort of a lie. And sort of a truth. You need to take a look at these older laws discovered by Universal Scientists to understand what I am saying.
These are the former rules of matter, that were studied and proven by the individuals that have brought you everything that is very cool and high tech. I warn you, if you are a college graduate from 1973 and on. You will have a very hard time trying to let go of what you have been taught. Because it will be, almost every basic you learned about science. You can keep the cool experiments that you have done.
Actually in this universe, no particle of electricity, actually touches another particle of electricity, ever. They come very close, but never touch. The proton as modern scientists call it, used to be the nucleus of the hydrogen atom or called the nucleus of the hydrogen atom. It used to be made up of particles of electricity. In other words, small spheres, with an infinite number of particles of electricity inside, make up one hydrogen atom. Not a Siamese hydrogen atom (H2).
Particles of electricity repel one another, so it seems ridiculous or ludicrous, that a small sphere might be formed, with an infinite number of particles of electricity, contained in that sphere. Somehow coexisting in such close proximity to one another.
The explanation is a two part explanation. There is the ambient radiation, the Germans kind of grasped the ambient radiation, but called it the ether. I am sure that some German scientists understood ambient radiation well, others just misused the terms to gain notoriety. As did many false Universal Scientists, misuse terminology to gain notoriety.
Then there is a phenomena of the Universe, the spheres mathematical ratio of its area, compared to its volume. As a sphere grows in size, its surface area diminishes exponentially compared to its volume. The formula for a sphere, causes a very small atom sized sphere, to have more surface area then volume. As the sphere grows this suddenly reverses and the larger sphere has a massive amount of volume compared to surface area.
The two formulas are:
Pi x Diameter x Diameter = spheres surface area Pi x Diameter x Diameter x Diameter รท 6 = spheres volume
These formula manifest themselves in our day to day lives, in so many ways. The size of a living cell is held to a certain size, because of this formula. A cell cannot take in food and expel waste fast enough to survive as the cell gets larger. The volume of the cell needs food and has to get rid of waste, the cell membrane has to allow food in and waste out. As the cell gets larger the surface area of the cell is too small, to allow these processes to take place. And the cell dies.
As far as the nucleus of the atom goes, this allows the ambient radiation to apply massive force against the huge surface area, and small volume of particles of electricity. Effectively trapping the particles of electricity in a spherical shape we call a hydrogen atom. These shapes make for the easiest path for ambient radiation to pass by each nucleus, and through the matter that is made up of the hydrogen atoms.
It is interesting that more discussions are not heard, about the fact that by assembling the same hydrogen atoms together in different numbers that they create a totally new substance. The way we learned about it, was that as the sphere or nucleus of an atom was combined with another nucleus, to form a new substance, it altered the flow of ambient radiation coming into and out of the substance. Often increasing the density of the substance substantially. Over the substance or element, with just one atom of hydrogen more or less.
The way heat, sound, electricity, light, and x-rays, effects the same nucleus in a different element, is also often very different. This is all due to the shape, structure or number, of hydrogen atoms in an element.
Particles of electricity do not orbit a hydrogen nucleus, as many have been told. Rather high velocity, rather straight moving particles of electricity, pass right though matter. Matter, that is 90 percent vacant, of the element, claiming that space. Even Tungsten is 90 percent space. What we perceive as matter is very much an illusion. Created by ambient radiation.
Without that ambient radiation, bombarding matter, matter would not be matter. It would become particles of electricity. We know from accidents and experiments that matter is just an electrical effect. Even Gods magnificent machine, the human body, is just an electrical effect. No matter how fascinating and resilient a machine it is. A human being can be positively accelerated, in such short distance, and time span, to speeds previously thought to kill any living creature. It can be done with rays, that positively accelerate the entire body, not just one surface of the body. Allowing the force to be evenly distributed throughout the body.
I wanted to make the point that nothing collides in this universe. No two particles ever actually touch. They come close however they do not touch. No two objects have ever collided. They were distorted, disintegrated, by ambient radiation passing very close to the objects, however nothing is touching anything else.
I have brought up a lot of information most individuals have not seen or heard before. You may wish to consider these older rules of matter, for a while, I will finish this up later.
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Aug 16, 2013 16:06:36 GMT -5
You may remember that I mentioned, there is no attraction force in this universe. Just the illusion of attraction created by pushing forces.
Most individuals do not think about how things actually work. Take a vacuum pump for instance, you might assume that a force is created by the pump that sucks air into it. In actuality the pump takes whatever air pressure exists, and allows that pressure to fill a chamber. That chamber is then compressed, and the air exits the pump, it is ejected under pressure, back into the atmosphere.
When this happens over a certain time period, the pressure on the low side, or vacuum side of the pump is reduced. Allowing ambient atmospheric pressure, to be pushed into the pump, or chamber the pump is evacuating the air from. However, and this is so important, at no time does any attraction force exist. That is why high vacuum processes take so long to accomplish. You have to wait for the extremely low pressure air left in a near vacuum, to expand and make its way to the pump orifice, and be pushed, by the remaining pressure, into the vacuum pump. The pump has no way to pull the remaining air into the pump. So therefore, scientifically you can never completely evacuate, a chamber of air. That is why all the subatomic, accelerated particle experiments, are ridiculous. They have no idea what is in their chamber, or how much of it there is.
If we look at gravity to actually figure out how it works, and not just create confusing hieroglyphics about gravity. Or draw big hugging magnetic lines around a picture of a globe. We instantly see something that is pretty evident or should be. Gravity cannot be a force, that is created within the planet, that is somehow, luring us to the center of the earth. There is no scientific basis for that assumption.
There is the fact that the earth is an object and is effecting ambient radiation that is striking the earth from every point around the earth. Could the earths presence create an area, around the earth, that causes, ambient radiation to create an effect like gravity? I would have to say "yes".
Most people know that in a totally dark room that is dust free, that you cannot see a ray of sunlight passing through the room. It is invisible. If we place an object in the room, and in the path of that ray of sunlight, the light beam becomes visible. Especially right near the object being hit by the rays of sunlight.
If we assume for a moment that the earths presence, causes a bottle neck to ambient radiation passing in and out of the earth. Much like sunlight striking the earth, causes an effect on the surface of the earth. But has no apparent effect beyond the surface. We know that the earth is altering the light to something else, some other form of radiation.
If you are standing at the equator in Ecuador at twelve noon, the sun would be striking the top of your head. Some would say the sun would be beating down on you. Scientifically they would be correct. But under your shoe it would be dark. So again we know that rays struck your body, had an effect on your body, but did not exit your body as light rays.
Now if we fired a large powerful x-ray machine downward, at a person standing on the earth in an upright position, the x-rays would hit his head, and most of the rays, would all penetrate his body. Those x-rays passing inside the body, and even those exiting under the persons feet, would create light, when they struck certain substances. X-rays are just a bit faster then Ultra Violet. When they strike certain substances they are slowed to Ultraviolet and even light speed. That is how they alter light sensitive film, that is kept in a dark shielded casing.
Now we have our theoretical gravity rays. We cannot see them, we can measure them though. They are always striking a person on the head when he is standing upright. They are constantly pushing him downward, towards the center of the earth. We know that large masses above the earth can alter these rays. Masses like the moon.
If we go back to that dark room, and we turn off the sunlight that is striking an object in that room. We see instantly that light is not coming out of the object. So we know that the rays that are being emitted from the object, although you can use equipment to see those rays, are not rays of sunlight.
When a man is standing on the earth, if we were to shut off gravity, the man would float or start to float. Kind of like a man on the moon, but with no gravity, he would just fly off into space.
The, earth is not emitting rays of gravity, upward, in any great quantity. I do not know exactly what rays, the surface of the earth emits. However I know they are not strong rays of gravity.
My point being the rays of gravity are a downward force, aimed at the earth from all around. The rays from the earth, are not a pressing force. Or at least not a pushing force equal to the gravity rays from above.
That is why the earth and the moon apparently attract one another. Each object is emitting, something other then the rays of gravity. Although the bodies themselves cause the effect of gravity, around them, the pressure of gravity, by their presence. By slowing incoming ambient radiation to gravity velocity. The emission from the planet or the moon, is not an emission of gravity.
Ambient radiation, that is heading toward the planet or the moon, is slowed to gravity velocity, this applies pressure upon them. The planets, or moons, emission, the ambient radiation, that is leaving the planet or moon, is not an emission of strong gravity.
The slowing of incoming ambient radiation to gravity velocity, is caused by repulsion, due to the bottle neck, of ambient radiation, entering and leaving the earths surface. Kind of like the ray of sunlight, hitting an object in the dark room. At the surface of a white object being struck by the invisible ray of sunlight, there is an intense almost blinding light created, by the invisible ray of sunlight, on the surface of the object.
During a small high velocity explosion, that is not shielded by metal, right before the blast. There is a force, like gravity that is, created, towards the bomb. It is like some one pushing you from behind towards the bomb. You can actually capture on camera UV light, heading towards the bomb, right before it explodes. It is a fascinating world we live in.
Some high velocity ammonia and aromatic hydrocarbon explosions can also create gravity like effects, with what can only be described, as a silent explosion. That can hurl a human being out of a building through walls, yet not blow down the walls, or create the familiar sound of an explosion.
It must be crazy to think about this in the exact reverse, of the way it was taught to most.
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Aug 19, 2013 23:54:03 GMT -5
I am saying, again and again, "bottle neck", and "at the surface a bottle neck is created" most people probably have never even heard of this type of analogy, applied to matter and radiation. Because most did not study ambient radiation.
If you have been following my fantastic story, you may be realizing, that maybe, it seems like there could be some feasibility to it all, even if totally untrue.
If you can understand what I am saying about matter being created and given density by ambient radiation. And also, that the information we get from matter, about matter, is brought to us, by ambient radiation, leaving the surface of the substance we are examining. As well as the ambient radiation heading to the substance, because ambient radiation is effected by the matter it is heading to. Then you can really start to put all the pieces together.
At the surface of dense solid matter, the atoms are creating an extreme obstacle to ambient radiation. The reason is that the air surrounding the dense substance, is made up of smaller atoms. So when the ambient radiation makes the transition from one substance to another. The path of ambient radiation is altered. In order to alter ambient radiations path, the matter must absorb some of the pressure created by being in the path, of the incoming ambient radiation.
Another reason dense substances are so compacted and under so much pressure. Is because inside these substances, ambient radiation is positively accelerated. The ambient radiation that is striking the substance from all sides, once it passes into, and through the surface of the substance. It basically gets past, the "bottle neck", it is positively accelerated, and ejected from the material. Making for less particles of electricity in the substance at any given time.
All sub matter particles in this universe repel one another, I was taught there is only one sub matter particle, the particle of electricity. That means that a shortage of particles of electricity is created inside these dense substances, as ambient radiation, is positively accelerated, while inside the dense substance. This causes a sort of collapse or condensing of the dense matter. Because the surface slows the incoming ambient radiation and the volume increases that same radiations velocity. It makes for less particles of electricity at any given moment inside the dense matter. You may remember the larger radius helical path post, about the larger helical path making for a shorter journey, time wise, that would be the journey through dense matter.
It is the surface area, that sets the speed of the incoming ambient radiation. This effects how ambient radiation feels about approaching, this particular substance in question. If there is an abundance of particles, of electricity at the surface of an of an object, ambient radiation will be slowed. Larger atoms tend to cause ambient radiation to create bottle necks near the substance in question. Most scientists look at radiation like it is just from a substance. Most do not consider it is also a flow to the normal material, or radio active substance.
This has to do with another rule of matter and ambient radiation. Matter needs ambient radiation to sustain its form, and ambient radiation needs matter to travel through. Ambient radiation cannot transverse or pass through a void of matter. It would be repelled by the matter on the other side of the void, and create a bomb. That is also why there is no such thing as a total vacuum, or absolute lack of matter within the universe. A bomb is just an area too high in voltage, an area with to many free particles of electricity, in one place at one time. In order to save the universe, from this phenomena, God in his infinite wisdom created the bomb. The bomb effect removes the bomb, that is blocking ambient radiation, by spreading it out, dispersing it, this makes the area safe once again.
Universal scientists did figure out a possible scenario for the edges of the universe, where no matter or communication exists, but it is just speculation and not really something to worry about considering we have "law makers" leading our country and world.
This may sound just crazy, but it is true as far as I know.
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Aug 20, 2013 0:21:02 GMT -5
You may be wondering how matter could somehow tell ambient radiation to slow down, before the ambient radiation gets there. It is actually just like electricity and in fact is electricity. One abundance of particles of electricity, will slow another abundance of particles of electricity. Basically the way Benjamin Franklin charged a copper air capacitor, and was able to stop the flow of lightning to ground. By placing an electrode between the incoming lightning voltage from a copper wire on his roof. And a grounded electrode. The lightning that would jump to the grounded electrode, could be stopped completely. It would not jump to anything. At least after Benjamin Franklin inserted his capacitor charged electrode between the other two electrodes.
|
|
|
Post by William McCormick on Aug 22, 2013 0:07:55 GMT -5
I have mentioned that matter is an electrical effect, a sort of illusion. Matter is actually 90 percent space, basically little particles that make up a sort of foam, that we call matter. So you might be wondering how could this foam seem so solid, hold up so much weight against gravity? Or have weight? You would be absolutely right to question that.
Consider matter as being made of little balls, with space between each atom in the matter, that the repelling ambient radiation races through. Then take a look at this short movie below, about objects striking one another. Consider that particles of electricity, are indestructible, and can be positively accelerated from zero to just about any velocity, in literally no time at all. They have no mass, no weight, because of this. They just go if you repulse them. They are bound by the rules of start stop and change. So as they approach other particles of electricity, they do slow.
When particles of electricity are combined with one another, The particles of electricity become spheres of particles, the single hydrogen atom. The single hydrogen atom, that is making up all other forms of matter. These little spheres have to transfer, repulsion forces, they receive on one side of the hydrogen atom, through an infinite number of particles of electricity, that make up that hydrogen atom. So they can transfer the energy, the repulsive force, to the to other side of the atom. Remember I mentioned stop start and change, this phenomena uses up and even reverses the flow of energy, as you will see in the movie, when spaces exist between objects being struck by other objects.
Watch the movie and see if you can figure out how a space between particles of electricity in an atom of hydrogen, and spaces between hydrogen atoms in matter might create an illusion of great density, or weight. That would create the solid objects we appear to have all around us.
|
|